probiotic strain l rhamnosus idcc 3201 (ATCC)
Structured Review

Probiotic Strain L Rhamnosus Idcc 3201, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 9 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/probiotic+strain/pmc13083229-39-1-7?v=ATCC
Average 94 stars, based on 9 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "Comparison of Viable and Heat‐Inactivated Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus IDCC 3201: Anti‐Pathogenic, Anti‐Inflammatory, and Microbiota Modulating Effect"
Article Title: Comparison of Viable and Heat‐Inactivated Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus IDCC 3201: Anti‐Pathogenic, Anti‐Inflammatory, and Microbiota Modulating Effect
Journal: Food Science & Nutrition
doi: 10.1002/fsn3.71780
Figure Legend Snippet: Anti‐pathogenic activities of L. rhamnosus IDCC 3201 and heat‐inactivated L. rhamnosus IDCC 3201 (RHT 3201) against Escherichia coli K12, Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923, Enterococcus faecalis ATCC 49619, and Salmonella Typhimurium ATCC 13311. Four pathogenic strains were treated with the cell‐free supernatants of L. rhamnosus IDCC 3201 and heat‐inactivated L. rhamnosus IDCC 3201 for 24 h. Data are shown as mean ± standard deviation ( n = 3). Means are significantly different with * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, and *** p < 0.001 using a t ‐test compared with the control groups.
Techniques Used: Standard Deviation, Control
Figure Legend Snippet: Differential metabolite abundances in fecal samples treated with Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus IDCC 3201 (RH 3201) and its heat‐inactivated form (RHT 3201). (A–D) Metabolites were significantly enriched in the RH 3201 group compared with the control (CON) and RHT 3201, including 3‐hydroxybutyric acid (A), 4‐aminobutanoic acid (B), l ‐serine (C), and l ‐threonine (D). (E–I) Metabolites significantly enriched in the RHT 3201 group compared with CON and RH 3201, including 2‐hydroxybutyrate (E), 2‐methylserine (F), glycine (G), glycolic acid (H), and succinic acid (I). Boxplots represent median (line), mean (diamond), interquartile range (box), and minimum/maximum values (whiskers); individual data points are shown as dots.
Techniques Used: Control
Figure Legend Snippet: Relative abundance of metabolites across different experimental groups. RHT 3201 (green), RH 3201 (red), and control (CON, blue). Rows correspond to individual metabolites, and columns represent biological replicates for each group. Metabolite levels are standardized ( z ‐score), with red indicating higher relative abundance and blue indicating lower relative abundance. Hierarchical clustering was applied both to metabolites (rows) and samples (columns), highlighting distinct metabolic profiles among the three groups. Key amino acids, organic acids, and lipid‐related metabolites are shown, illustrating differential metabolic responses induced by viable and heat‐inactivated Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus IDCC 3201 treatments.
Techniques Used: Control
Figure Legend Snippet: Alpha and beta diversity of the fecal microbiota in Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus IDCC 3201 (RH) and heat‐inactivated RHT 3201 (RHT). Alpha‐diversity was assessed using the (A) Shannon, (B) Simpson, and (C) Chao1 indices. Beta‐diversity was visualized using nonmetric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) ordination based on species‐level fecal microbiota profiles, shown in (D) and (E). Each point represents an individual sample.
Techniques Used:
Figure Legend Snippet: Comparison of fecal microbiota composition at the species level between Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus IDCC 3201 (RH) and heat‐inactivated RHT 3201 (RHT) groups. Relative abundances of key bacterial species are shown, including (A) Bifidobacterium pseudocatenulatum , (B) Lactobacillus rhamnosus , (C) Ligilactobacillus ruminis , (D) Bifidobacterium longum , and (E) Anaerostipes hadrus . Data are expressed as mean relative abundance (%). Statistical significance is indicated where applicable (* p < 0.05; exact p values shown for nonsignificant comparisons). Violin plots illustrate the distribution and variability of the data within each group.
Techniques Used: Comparison

